Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Angled implant brush for hygienic maintenance of full-arch fixed-implant rehabilitations: a pilot study

Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2020³â 50±Ç 5È£ p.340 ~ 354
Setti Paolo, Pesce Paolo, Dellepiane Elena, Bagnasco Francesco, Zunin Paola, Menini Maria,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Setti Paolo ) - University of Genoa Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences
 ( Pesce Paolo ) - University of Genoa Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences
 ( Dellepiane Elena ) - University of Genoa Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences
 ( Bagnasco Francesco ) - University of Genoa Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences
 ( Zunin Paola ) - University of Genoa Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences
 ( Menini Maria ) - University of Genoa Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences

Abstract


Purpose: This pilot study was conducted to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of an angled implant brush for home oral hygiene of full-arch fixed-implant prostheses.

Methods: Forty-one patients treated with a full-arch implant rehabilitation in the maxilla or mandible (164 implants) for at least 4 months were enrolled. The screw-retained fixed prostheses were removed and baseline (T0) parameters were recorded, including plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP). All patients completed a 5-item questionnaire on hygiene maintenance and received an implant brush for home hygiene. After 1 month (T1) PI, PD, and BOP were recorded again and patients completed a 7-item questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with the implant brush. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the significance of changes in PI, PD, and BOP. A P value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results: A statistically significant reduction of BOP (0.62¡¾0.6 at T0 vs. 0.5¡¾0.5 at T1; P=0.032) was found, while no statistically significant changes in PD (1.74¡¾0.5 mm at T0 vs. 1.77¡¾0.5 mm at T1; P=0.050) or PI (1.9¡¾0.7 at T0 vs. 1.7¡¾0.7 at T1; P=0.280) occurred. According to the 7-item questionnaire, patients reported no difficulty in using the angled brush (63.4%) and deemed it highly (46.3%) or very highly (4.8%) effective in improving their home oral hygiene.

Conclusions: Within the limits of the present pilot study, the patients experienced a reduction of BOP 1 month after being instructed to use the angled implant brush. The angled implant brush appeared to be a well-accepted device for home-care hygiene of full-arch fixed-implant rehabilitations.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implants; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Oral hygiene; Dental plaque; Toothbrushing

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed